|
August Issue of the Taos Newsletter: Project
Management
Interview with Marti Menacho,
Vice President and Chief Information Officer, TIBCO Software,
Inc.
Taos: Tell us a little bit
about your company and organization.
Marti: TIBCO is a leading enabler
of real-time business and the world’s
largest independent business integration software company. Worldwide
headquarters are in Palo Alto. The company functions fairly centralized
with a majority of the business processes functioning out of Palo
Alto. We have a few development centers in the US and India. Sales,
professional services and support are based in offices around the
world in order to be closer to our customer base. However, we recently
acquired another software company headquartered in the UK. They
grew their business through acquisition of successful reseller
companies and, as a result, continued to operate fairly autonomous
as country P & L’s. The company is now moving to localize
some of the business processes.
IT at TIBCO is fairly centralized and aligns closely
with the centralized model of TIBCO’s business processes.
Company direction for IT is centralized in Palo Alto with local
deployment and support in the UK for EMEA and in India for development
support locally. APAC is currently supported remotely from Palo
Alto and with local technical staff. We have been moving more and
more first line of support out into the region and relying on the
different time zones to provide global support. We are also looking
for leadership in certain technology directions to come from and
pilot in the regions outside of the Americas.
Project Portfolio Development and Governance
Taos: In your organization, can you talk about
how Program and Project Management play a role?
Marti: We’ve implemented a project governance
model at TIBCO. At a strategic project setting level, we have an
Executive Advisory Board (EAB) with whom IT conducts a quarterly
review to:
- Determine priorities and investments,
- Articulate how projects fit into the bigger picture and build
upon each other to achieve certain business benefits, and
- Determine the “box” that we are going to work
within -
- Timeframe
- Money
- Resources
Both our infrastructure projects and our application and business
projects go through the same review process. The business projects
are sponsored and presented by business owners (e.g. Marketing,
Sales, Finance, etc.). The infrastructure projects are sponsored
by me as the infrastructure business owner within the company.
Taos: What advice would you give to other IT leaders
who also recognize the need for such governance in their operations.
How did you get buy-in?
Marti: It’s an iterative process that
has to be based on what will fit within your business. We’re
growing, and management was able to recognize that we needed
a holistic approach (rather than a departmental approach) to
understanding and prioritizing IT projects. Within my own operation,
I had to work to get my team to understand that even infrastructure
projects have to provide business value.
Step One
To break it down, we first need to understand all the moving
pieces so we documented our infrastructure and applications inventory.
This included all the departmental developed and managed systems.
Then, working with my team documented a recommended disposition
for everything based upon our knowledge. Disposition categories
were:
- Keep and maintain
- Keep and upgrade
- Replace
- Retire
- To be determined – more information is needed
Step Two
Then, based on the inventory and the disposition,
we talked with our business counterparts – some conversations
were strategic, about business plans and initiatives. Others
were more tactical, about maintenance contracts and end-of-life
support. This helped us to see redundancies and duplicate efforts
and ensure that we had the business interests appropriately accounted
for.
Interestingly, in these discussions many of
the business owners wanted to talk to me about how pleased they
were with the support they were getting from the helpdesk. I
had to be clear that what I needed to talk about were the things
that were driving their operation, for example “Let’s talk about how you’re
managing campaigns and whether you are getting the results you
expect. What are the other ways you are getting leads? How are
you producing the SEC reports?” Instead of talking about
what IT does today or what we need IT to do, we talked about what they were
trying to do. And it turns out that there were a lot of things
that overlapped between departments. In one example, Finance was
struggled with revenue recognition because of the way Sales quoted
products. At the same time, Sales was talking about how they couldn’t
get contracts through because there were so many review points
in the contract process. Finding these overlaps helped me build
my case for the overall governance and Executive Advisory Board
model. I could show them that they were essentially having the
same problem but didn’t realize it because they were taking
a departmental view and putting more steps in their own departmental
processes or asking IT to provide them with a new report or a new
field to track it.
A project like this requires significant cross-functional
business process change. So it’s not necessarily just “I need
a new application” or “I need a change to add a new
field” or “I need a new networking thing-a-ma-jigger.” Instead,
it’s “I have a business problem and it affects more
than me. As a business owner of sales, of finance or marketing,
I can usually fix my business process issues within my group, but
I need someone to help me fix them when they involve other organizations.” Most
often we find that issues do involve other organizations and so
it’s IT’s role to connect the dots.
Step Three
At this point, I went back to the executive team and proposed
the advisory board and governance model. One of the things that
I stressed is that there would never be enough resources to do
everything we wanted to do, and it is our role as an executive
group to agree upon a clearly defined roadmap. We never had a roadmap
before for IT, now we do.
Project Management Structure and Methodology
Taos: Once you got the governance model in
place, did you next build your Project Management Office (PMO)?
Marti: No. I wish! Right now we don’t
have the luxury for a separate PMO. If I could, we would have a
PMO Director who would centrally own the portfolio and manage all
the tools and templates we use to support our methodology, but
it’s hard for a company to go from 0 to 60 in less than a
year. Instead, I introduced the model that we use, and continually
work with my management team and their project teams to develop
common templates and tools to support the different phases of a
project. In that way, they buy-in to this process and we make sure
the tools and templates really work for our structure and needs.
Taos: What is the Project Management Methodology
you came up with?
Marti: There are five phases - Planning and assessment,
design and prototyping, construction, testing and conversion, implementation
and support. These are not unique to TIBCO, but we went a level
deeper and defined what happens in those phases and what the EAB
and Project Sponsor are responsible for (See Chart).

Given that I haven’t been here a full year
yet, we’ve
only had our third Executive Advisory Board meeting. One on the
outcomes is to build the rolling roadmap so that the current quarter
and the following quarter are firm, the 3 rd quarter is soft and
the 4 th quarter is in a liquid state. We have yet to go through
a full cycle but we are close and it’s working very well.
This will be a big asset as we go into next year’s budget
planning not only for IT, but also for the business groups.
Taos: You mentioned you don’t have a
PMO. Do you have dedicated Project Managers?
Marti: Not really. Our senior analysts are managing
projects today. It’s a stretch sometimes, but people really
want to improve their skills in this area. Given this, ideally
I’d
have my PMO Director mentoring and providing more guidance through
the project lifecycle.
Adoption
Taos: Without a dedicated champion for Project Management, how
are you instilling your methodology within your operation?
Marti: Depending on the skill level, they work
closely with their manager or director. We schedule project reviews
throughout the project, and we have them role play – dry
run - preparation for the quarterly EAB meetings. This is a great
learning opportunity as well as preparation for the meeting. It
really helps get those operating in PM roles get indoctrinated
into the system. Senior IT management asks a lot of good questions,
gives realtime feedback, and creates a safe environment for people
to learn. As a result, our team thinks more like the business owners.
Tools
Taos: How do you determine what tools are going
to be used in which projects, especially when you get down to smaller
projects where the individual contributor or individual team members
act as their own project managers?
Marti: We have a lot of that. Regardless of
the project size, every project starts with a Project-At-A-Glance
and is required to update the Project Status which includes financial
tracking to budget. The idea, even for the small projects, is
to go after approval for the box you are going to work within – cost,
timeframe, resources – and as long as you work within that,
based on the value you sold, you don’t have to go back to
the well. So we need to make sure that we’re tracking within
that box.
At a previous company, we had a Corporate
Project Management Office that lent themselves out to projects.
They developed a tool kit of templates and techniques and were
used based upon the kind of problem that you were trying to solve
and where you were in this project. That’s the same type of thing I’d
like to do here - to create tools and ideas that people can pull
out of that box when they need it.
Taos: Are you using or do you for see purchasing
tools such as Niku’s tools, or Mercury’s tools, or
Microsoft Project for the enterprise, etc.?
Marti: Personally, I’ve only used Microsoft
Project and in-house developed portal tools. We have all of our
projects in our TIBCO portal on our intranet. This way we can
share information easily. Mostly what you need with projects
is the ability to share information.
Microsoft Project is also good from the standpoint
of being able to illustrate and track and make sure you’re on target to critical
milestone. For clear reporting I’ve used a couple of homegrown
templates that I’ve created or adapted over the years using
common red, yellow, green indications. On a weekly basis I can
easily take a look at any of the major projects that are going
on and sit down with the team and quickly understand what they
need.
Measuring Success
Taos: How does TIBCO define and measure the
success of a project?
Marti: Each project has its own ROI associated with it, including:
- expected results, e.g. we’re going to now be able to
do something that we couldn’t do before and we expect that
that’s going to give us greater flexibility in key areas,
and
- measurable benefits associated with:
- cost savings,
- cost avoidance,
- revenue generation
The philosophy that we are adopting is
that the project doesn’t
stop when it goes live. That’s just a milestone in the life
cycle of that project. The Executive Advisory Board tracks the project
beyond “go live” and the Executive Sponsor reports on
whether or not we achieved or are on track to achieve the benefits
that we said we were going to get. If we’re not on track
to achieve those, then the Executive Sponsor and the team may recommend
an appropriate plan to adjust.
Selling the Value of an Infrastructure
Project
Taos: Can you give me an example of how
you sold the value of an infrastructure project?
Marti : We just did a project for moving from NT to Active
Directory. There were two business questions to be answered
here.
- Given that NT is near EOL (end-of-life), do we go on our
own or do we look for vendor support? Is this an area of
our business which is important enough - tier one, critical
functionality to justify not going it alone?
- How do we get to single authentication?
Based on the criticality of the system to the business and
the desire for single authentication, we could propose the
migration as a business project and not a technology project
that they would probably not care about.
Another example - we just proposed the movement
from the SunOne mail platform to the Exchange mail platform.
Most people wouldn’t
really be interested in that because it’s “behind
the scenes”. They can still use the Outlook client with
either one. However, we proposed it based on the additional business
benefits associated with using Exchange and Outlook – ties
into Blackberry and our SalesForce.com application.
Project Management Challenges
Taos: What is the biggest challenge you’ve
had to deal with around project management?
Marti: Delivery. It’s all around expectation. I’m
not looking for people to tell me what I want to hear because
I want to hear it, and then not be able to do it. Tell me what
reality is and tell me early so that we can change the reality
if we can.
Taos: Do you foresee needing to teach people
how to better anticipate where the problems might lie or to
better scope what it is that they have to do? And, is this
trainable or does it come with experience?
Marti: Actually, I think that the most challenging thing
is that people always have a more positive outlook than perhaps
they should. They usually think that if they work hard, it
will work out somehow. So really the challenge is getting people
to talk about the problems, and potential problems and to do
so early. A lot of times, people work harder than they need
to because they don’t identify their risks associated
with various aspects of the project, or they don’t recognize
them early on. You always hear about the dash to the finish
line or carrying the ball into the end zone and the amount
of work - the push - at the end of the project. Well, a lot
of times, the push at the end of the project is because all
of those little things that you thought were going to probably
be okay, but they weren’t quite okay yet.
Marti Menacho has had an impressive 20-year career
working for some of the Who's Who manufacturing and high tech companies
in Silicon Valley. She has successfully blended her knowledge of
business operations and technology to develop strategies and create
solutions that has enabled companies to achieve substantial growth.
As Vice President and CIO at TIBCO Software, Ms. Menacho is responsible
for TIBCO’s global IT presence. TIBCO Software is a leading
enabler of real-time business and the world’s largest independent
business integration software company. Prior to joining TIBCO,
Menacho was the Sales and Marketing Executive Vice President Saama
Technologies. Ms. Menacho is responsible for business expansion
through value-added partnerships with customers and strategic partners.
She directly managed the sales and marketing organizations, increased
margins from 35% to 44%, and was personally responsible for 25%
of the company’s revenue in a flat and declining economy.
Menacho held Chief Information Executive positions at Nortel Networks
and Clarify Corporation. At Nortel she was an integral part of
integrating new company acquisitions into the business structure.
As the CIO at Clarify, Menacho was responsible for showcasing for
their own CRM product. Under her leadership IT was actively involved
in defining requirements and beta testing new product releases.
Menacho held management positions at 3Com, SGI, ASK Computer Systems
and Syntex. She was a member of Vice President Gore’s eGovernment
committee during the Clinton administration and is currently on
The Professional Services Network board of directors.
TIBCO Software Inc. is the leading independent business integration
software company in the world, demonstrated by market share and
analyst reports. In addition, TIBCO is a leading enabler of Real-Time
Business, helping companies become more cost-effective, more agile
and more efficient. TIBCO has delivered the value of Real-Time
Business, what TIBCO calls The Power of Now®, to over 2,000
customers around the world and in a wide variety of industries.
|