|
September Issue of the Taos Newsletter: Sarbanes-Oxley
(SOX)
Interview with Shawn Farshchi,
Vice President of Technical Operations and
Chief Information Officer of WebEx Communications Inc.
Taos: When did
you realize the impact that SOX would have on your IT department
?
Shawn: Information about Sarbanes-Oxley came up through the ranks
of IT. It showed up on our radar well before finance discussed
it with us. We knew it was coming but we waited until finance dealt
with their processes and was ready to deal with IT before we made
a concerted effort to address it.
Taos: Can you give us an overview of
the SOX efforts you have under way?
Shawn: We are using E&Y (Ernst & Young,
ed.) as our pre-auditor with KPMG for the final audit. Our audit
is this year, so we are pretty far along in our process. We have
five full time people driving process and every single line manager
is responsible for their section.
Taos: What do you see as the strengths
a pre-auditor brings to the table?
Shawn: Consultative mode: our pre-auditor tapped
into what everyone else was doing, and was able to assist, especially
in creating efficiencies in document production. IT shops are good
on developing SOPs. Our pre-auditor was able to focus our energy
and efforts to get the most out of the effort. Their ability to
develop test plans was also very helpful and productive.
Taos: Were you able to prioritize in order to focus effort in
particular areas?
Shawn: No we did not break it into different priorities. All
aspects of compliance are important and we worked on them together.
We did prioritize by high, medium and low impacts, but pursued
all avenues to ensure compliance.
Taos: Where do you think you have work
to do?
Shawn: We’ve had a good handle on this since we had been
through a SAS-70 and WebTrust certification recently, so very little
was surprising about this process. We found all of our issues had
already been addressed and that mostly it was a matter of tidying
up access control, change control and code management. We found
mostly just consistency issues.
Taos: Did you look at any of the software applications
on the market to help you with SOX?
Shawn: Yes, we did look at some of them and
they all appeared overly complicated. Maybe because we are a smaller
company, it seemed most of these applications were aimed at a much
larger enterprises and really were not designed for us.
Taos: Do you use a document management system
or do you use something internally built?
Shawn: We do use a document repository system where documents
are checked in and out. This also helps provide our audit trail
for the auditors to ensure that we actually are using these processes
and the documents we’ve created.
Taos: Where/how do you store the information
on actual process to feed the audit trails?
Shawn: Our Remedy Ticketing System, it logs all requests and
resolutions. We also use system logs and various other tracking
devices.
Taos: How will you audit processes going forward
and maintain your SOX compliance?
Shawn: SOX will become the responsibility of
our security team, as well as every line manager. The security
team will be responsible for constantly updating and maintaining
our readiness. They will be performing the internal testing next
year.
Taos: What are some of the problems you have heard other companies
have encountered?
Shawn: Well we have had it pretty easy. We are very centralized
with just one primary data center for IT. Companies with multiple
data centers scattered around the country have to go through an
intensive SOX effort for each data center. It is also a problem
for a company that has made multiple acquisitions. Integrating
the disparate groups into a compliance effort can be very difficult.
Taos: How much do you estimate the SOX effort will take?
Shawn: I estimate about 3,000 hours including consultant effort.
I believe this is typical of almost any small or medium sized company.
Taos: We heard that Sun was spending multiple millions on their
SOX efforts.
Shawn: Yes, I heard others were actually taking a hit of several
cents per share this time around to account for the cost of SOX
compliance. With so many mergers out there, bringing compliance
to all of these distributed organizations must be an incredibly
painful process.
Taos: Do you see SOX audit preparation as an advantage – an
opportunity to professionalize your IT operations?
To staff it has certainly reached overkill
proportions in day-to-day operations. At my level it gives me repeatability;
repeatability I can count on rather than the heroic efforts of
individual staff. I do not mind it at all. I worked in a nuclear
power plant once and SOX is very similar to the NRC (nuclear regulatory
commission, ed.) requirements. Every single thing you did was documented
and that was just what you did, it was expected of you and built
into the organization. There was a huge audit trail.
Taos: What advice would you share with your fellow CIOs as they
go through their preparation?
Shawn: Ensure that you have already worked everything out with
finance; the significant financial processes identification, agreement
upon which systems IT support them, and narrow your scope down
to just what is absolutely necessary. Otherwise you will spend
a lot of time chasing down unnecessary paths. Also, everyone in
IS should own their processes; push the accountability through
the organization. Lastly, SOX is associated with considerable cultural
change in an organization. Documentation can be tedious and IT
people are notorious for not documenting details and resisting
it. IT managers need to follow the process consistently for change
to happen.
Shawn Farshchi is the Vice President
of Technical Operations and Chief Information Officer of
WebEx Communications Inc. which is a leader
in the multimedia business communications industry. He has
over 22 years of development and services management experience
at companies such as DHL Airways, Broadvision and GTE Sprint.
Mr. Farshchi has also served in a variety of technical and
management positions at Bechtel Power Corp., GTE Spacenet,
Oracle, Pacific Gas and Electric, and Syntex Corporation.
|